Government Operations Committee

Thursday, September 17, 2026, 10 a.m. (Boston time), Boston City Hall, 1 City Hall Square, Boston, MA 02201

Hearing on Docket #1541

Committee: Government Operations Committee

Video of the meeting

On the agenda

Documents

Summary

The Government Operations Committee, chaired by Councilor Coletta Zapata, held a second hearing on Docket 1541, an ordinance sponsored by Councilors Santana and Louijeune that would set up a city permit and training framework for unarmed security guards, requiring 40 hours of initial training through a city-certified nonprofit provider and 8 hours each year after that, paid for by employers. An industry panel from Allied Universal, two Black-owned security firms and the Conference of Boston Teaching Hospitals said they support training but opposed the ordinance as drafted, objecting to the ban on employer-provided training, the 40-hour requirement, costs to small businesses, penalties and the implementation timeline; they suggested letting employers attest to meeting minimum standards, or starting with city employees. A 32BJ SEIU panel of union staff, guards and a trainer supported the ordinance, describing minimal or online-only training on the job and saying certified in-person training would be transferable between employers. Letters were read from Councilor Culpepper, who opposes the ordinance in its current form, and from Councilor Durkan, who expressed concerns, and seven people gave public testimony. The chair said working sessions will follow, and the docket remains in committee.

Transcript

0:07 and.

0:31 the.

1:45 Number.

7:04 And.

7:29 The.

14:01 And.

14:25 The.

18:00 Good morning everybody.

18:01 Happy to be here.

18:03 For the record my name is

18:04 gabrielle collette is the

18:05 district one city councilor and

18:06 I'm the chair of the boston

18:07 city council committee on

18:11 government operations today's

18:12 SEPTEMBER 17th 2026.

18:15 The exact time is 10:18 A.M.

18:16 This hearing is being recorded.

18:18 It is also being live streamed

18:21 at boston.Gov/city council dash

18:24 tv and broadcast on xfinity

18:26 channel eight, rcn channel 82

18:30 and fios channel 964 written

18:31 comments MAY be sent to the

18:33 committee email at

18:35 kgo@boston.Gov and will be made

18:36 a part of the record and

18:37 available to all councilors.

18:39 Public testimony will be taken

18:40 at the end of this hearing.

18:42 Individuals will be called on

18:44 in order in the order in which

18:45 they signed up and we'll have

18:45 two minutes to testify.

18:47 If you are interested in

18:49 testifying in person, please

18:50 add your name to the sign up

18:51 sheet near the entrance of the

18:51 chamber.

18:53 If you're looking to testify

18:55 virtually, please email our

18:59 central staff liaison megan at

19:00 amiga and echo.

19:06 Are yugi d o m a r t I

19:07 n@boston.Gov for the link in

19:09 your name will be added to the

19:09 list.

19:12 Today's hearing is on docket

19:12 1541.

19:14 an ordinance establishing

19:15 minimum training and training

19:16 requirements for unarmed

19:17 security guards.

19:19 This matter was sponsored by

19:20 councilors henry santana and

19:21 rosie louijeune and was

19:24 referred to the committee on

19:25 AUGUST 5th 2026.

19:26 Today I am joined by my

19:29 colleagues in order of arrival

19:30 I think it was councilor ed

19:31 flynn because he's the first

19:32 one every single time.

19:33 So councilor at flynn, thank

19:34 you so much for being here and

19:36 the lead sponsor

19:37 councilor santana and I know

19:38 that we'll be joined by

19:39 council louijeune shortly but

19:41 for now I will go to opening

19:44 remarks and lead with the

19:45 original co-sponsor

19:46 councilor santana and

19:47 councilor twin council santana

19:48 you have before.

19:49 Awesome.

19:50 good morning.

19:51 Thank you.

19:52 Um chair called us about that.

19:54 Um and thank you everyone for

19:55 being here this morning.

19:57 Unarmed security guards serve a

19:59 vital role in boston's public

20:00 safety infrastructure.

20:02 Every day they protect people

20:03 and property and our health

20:05 care facilities, residential

20:07 buildings, colleges and public

20:08 spaces.

20:09 They are often the first to

20:10 respond when someone is

20:11 experiencing a medical

20:13 emergency, a mental health

20:15 crisis and other urgent

20:15 situations.

20:17 They also regularly work with

20:18 individuals battling

20:20 homelessness and substance use

20:20 disorders.

20:23 i was a security guard myself

20:25 and the only kind of training I

20:26 received was when I was on my

20:28 first day when I was chaperoned

20:29 by someone.

20:31 After that I was left on my own

20:33 to handle any type of situation

20:35 that might come up despite all

20:36 the important responsibilities

20:37 that came up.

20:39 There are currently no training

20:40 requirements for unarmed

20:41 security guards in boston at

20:43 the state or local level.

20:45 These professionals are

20:46 expected to make quick

20:48 decisions, de-escalate

20:49 conflicts and respond to

20:50 emergencies.

20:52 Yet many have not received any

20:54 training to prepare them for

20:56 these situations and might have

20:57 only been in the job for a few

20:58 weeks.

20:59 Establishing these training

21:01 standards is about investing in

21:02 both worker safety and public

21:03 safety.

21:05 I appreciate the concerns I

21:06 have heard from many

21:07 stakeholders in the community

21:09 as well as from business owners

21:10 regarding the current language

21:12 of this ordinance.

21:13 This hearing provides an

21:14 opportunity for all

21:15 stakeholders to share their

21:15 feedback.

21:17 We want to ensure that everyone

21:18 is included in these

21:20 conversations and that we are

21:21 aligned as we move forward.

21:23 Our goal is to pass legislation

21:24 that is appropriate for this

21:25 moment and reflects the needs

21:27 and concerns of our community.

21:29 I understand and appreciate the

21:31 objections that I that I have

21:34 heard about, um, the timeline

21:36 and roadmap towards the

21:37 implementation along with what

21:39 some of you shared on how you

21:41 can conduct your training from

21:42 for your own security

21:43 personnel.

21:44 I am looking forward to the

21:46 discussion today and um

21:48 charting a path seeing a path

21:50 forward by investing in the

21:52 people who are often on the

21:53 first to respond.

21:54 We are investing in safer

21:56 workspaces and a safer boston

21:56 for everyone.

21:57 thank you councilor santana.

22:00 Councilor flynn, you know how

22:00 the floor.

22:03 Thank you MADAM Chair and thank

22:07 you to the panel for being here

22:09 for the public testimony that

22:10 we're going to hear from as

22:11 well.

22:13 Um, before before I begin and

22:15 I'll just have very brief

22:15 comments.

22:18 Um, I am going to be leaving

22:21 this meeting in a few minutes.

22:24 Um, but hopefully I'm back by

22:24 1130.

22:26 I do have an appointment that I

22:27 do have to make.

22:29 Um, but it is my plan to be

22:31 back by 1130 for the remainder

22:32 of the meeting.

22:36 Um, but what what I wanted to

22:37 highlight in my opening

22:41 statement is the important role

22:42 security and, um, security

22:44 guards play in our city.

22:47 Yes, we need training.

22:49 We need to support support them

22:51 but we also need to support a

22:53 lot of small businesses

22:55 security businesses that um,

22:57 hire a lot of people especially

22:59 businesses owned by people

23:00 of color as well.

23:04 My my challenge or goal is to

23:06 see how we're able to work

23:10 together for language in this

23:12 document um, that supports a

23:14 compromise and ensures that we

23:16 provide the necessary training

23:19 for unarmed security guards but

23:21 also to support companies, um,

23:23 that play a critical role in

23:25 our city, especially the

23:27 importance of companies owned

23:28 by people of color.

23:30 They have to be respected as

23:30 well.

23:32 Uh, mr chair, MADAM Chair,

23:33 thank you very much.

23:34 Thank you.

23:35 we've been joined by

23:36 councilor um, aaron murphy.

23:38 Councilor murphy, would you

23:39 like any remarks?

23:40 Yeah, just happy to be here.

23:42 Part of the conversation like

23:43 council flynn was just saying

23:44 it's a balance.

23:46 We want to make sure anyone who

23:49 is in these roles important

23:50 roles have the training they

23:50 need.

23:52 But at the same time we have to

23:54 make sure that we're listening

23:57 to those who you know, employ

23:58 them and train them the way you

24:00 know, so just it's a balance

24:01 and I'm here to listen and get

24:03 all the information I can to

24:04 make sure the language is

24:04 right.

24:05 Thank you.

24:09 Uh, we also have a letter

24:10 of absence from

24:11 councilor culpeper that I will

24:12 read in part.

24:14 Um so dear chair, what is the

24:15 part that members of the

24:15 committee on government

24:17 operations I regret to inform

24:19 you I am unable to attend this

24:19 morning's hearing.

24:21 I would like to thank, uh,

24:22 folks for holding this hearing

24:23 and panelists and members

24:25 of the public for their

24:25 participation.

24:27 Well, while I support ensuring

24:29 that unarmed security officers

24:30 in boston receive appropriate

24:31 training, I have serious

24:32 concerns about this ordinance.

24:34 I remain opposed to it in its

24:34 current form.

24:36 My office has received numerous

24:37 letters and communication and

24:38 has met directly with

24:39 businesses, institutions and

24:40 community stakeholders who have

24:41 raised concerns about the

24:43 ordnances training requirements

24:44 restrictions on employer

24:45 provided training, permitting

24:46 structure penalties and

24:47 implement implementation

24:48 timeline.

24:49 I'm concerned about the

24:50 potential burden on small

24:52 minority owned security

24:53 businesses and employers that

24:55 already provide substantial

24:56 training tailored to their

24:57 workplaces um having heard from

24:59 those who would be directly

25:01 impacted, I cannot support this

25:02 document in its current form.

25:04 Sincerely, councilor culpeper

25:06 representative district seven

25:07 um I also just want to

25:09 acknowledge that while we don't

25:10 have an administration a

25:12 mayoral administration specific

25:14 panel, we are joined by two

25:16 here in the audience me me um

25:17 targeted I'm so sorry.

25:18 My message your name wrong.

25:21 Uh um but uh, always a friend

25:23 to labor, um, and deputy

25:25 director of labor policy, uh,

25:26 from the office of labor

25:27 compliance and worker

25:28 protections and the worker

25:29 empowerment cabinet.

25:30 and we also have monique

25:32 mitchell senior program manager

25:34 uh, living wage and wage theft,

25:36 um, overseeing living wage and

25:37 wage theft within the office

25:38 of labor compliance and worker

25:41 protections uh, before we had

25:44 to or we go to our panel um,

25:45 our business panel I do just

25:47 want to give a brief overview

25:48 for those listening.

25:49 Um, the background of this

25:50 ordinance is that it

25:51 establishes the city permitting

25:53 and training framework for

25:54 unarmed security guards working

25:54 in boston.

25:57 It requires 40 hours of initial

25:58 training within 90 days for new

26:00 guards, 180 days for existing

26:02 guards and eight hours annually

26:03 thereafter.

26:05 Training must be through a city

26:06 certified program, and

26:07 employers must pay training

26:09 costs and compensate guards for

26:10 training time.

26:12 The curriculum includes cpr,

26:16 smart aid and overdose response

26:17 ,de-escalation, mental and

26:19 behavioral health, emergency

26:20 response, building operations,

26:21 incident reporting and

26:22 workplace rights.

26:24 Uh there was a hearing while I

26:25 was away on maternity leave.

26:27 I want to thank uh, vice chair

26:27 councilor louijeune for holding

26:29 that and all those who

26:29 participated.

26:31 It seems as though there was a

26:31 broad agreement on the goal.

26:33 However there was significant

26:35 disagreement over the structure

26:37 workers, um and guards

26:38 testified to receiving little

26:39 to no training despite

26:40 confronting medical emergencies

26:43 ,behavioral health crisis and

26:44 public safety situations.

26:45 there were some concerns from

26:48 the council over the our

26:49 requirement uh part time

26:51 workers certification provider

26:52 availability, small business

26:54 impacts uh in the

26:54 administration testimony

26:56 acknowledged more conversations

26:57 and due diligence were needed.

26:59 We also heard from industry and

27:02 business uh folks their

27:03 concerns centered around

27:04 employers generally supporting

27:06 baseline training but argued

27:07 the ordinance is too

27:08 prescriptive and costly and

27:08 could.

27:10 Be difficult to implement.

27:12 Um, so with that context, I'm

27:13 pleased to now pass this over

27:14 to our.

27:17 Panel um, in whatever order you

27:18 so choose.

27:19 But I will go ahead and

27:21 introduce you now we have uh,

27:22 cameron kilpatrick who is

27:23 virtual who's the vice

27:24 PRESIDENT Of government

27:25 relations of allied universal.

27:27 Thank you cameron uh, for being

27:30 here we have herbie do rene who

27:31 is the principal and ceo

27:33 of wind walker solutions.

27:34 He's also the board of the

27:35 chair of the black economic

27:35 council massachusetts.

27:37 And we have david consul who is

27:39 the ceo and co-founder of red

27:40 con security and also a member

27:42 of the black economic

27:43 council of massachusetts.

27:44 And patricia mcmullen, who's

27:47 the executive director of the

27:48 conference of boston teaching

27:49 hospitals.

27:50 Thank you so much for being

27:52 here and please feel free to uh

27:53 or do you have a preferred

27:55 person to go first?

27:56 It's okay.

27:58 i'm happy to go.

27:58 Okay.

27:59 go right ahead.

27:59 Patricia.

28:00 Thank you.

28:00 Um.

28:01 good morning.

28:04 Uh, tish mcmullen, executive

28:06 director of the conference

28:06 of boston.

28:07 Teaching hospitals.

28:10 Our organization works to

28:13 support 12 member teaching

28:15 hospitals across greater boston

28:16 and appreciates.

28:18 The opportunity to comment on

28:19 this docket.

28:22 As you MAY know, our teaching

28:25 hospitals rely on a wide range

28:28 of personnel, including unarmed

28:30 security officers to ensure the

28:32 safety of our patients and

28:34 their families, our employees

28:35 and our neighbors.

28:38 Training of our security

28:41 officers is of paramount

28:43 importance to our organizations

28:45 ,and we very much appreciate

28:47 your attention to this

28:50 important issue.

28:51 Given the importance of the

28:53 training within our hospitals,

28:56 we believe a one size fits all

28:59 approach is not appropriate to

29:00 this critical training.

29:03 Rather we feel that there is

29:05 ample opportunity for the city

29:08 to recognize our dynamic and

29:11 robust training programs while

29:13 still pursuing your goal

29:15 of broader access to training

29:17 for individuals serving in

29:20 these important positions,

29:22 hospitals and large academic

29:24 medical centers in particular

29:26 are extraordinarily unique

29:29 environments that operate under

29:31 considerable state and federal

29:32 regulatory requirements that

29:36 are related to patient and

29:38 employee security and training.

29:40 Hospitals have to meet these

29:42 standards in order to maintain

29:45 our licenses from the

29:46 commonwealth of massachusetts.

29:48 Our participation in the

29:50 medicare and medicaid programs

29:52 and our accreditation from the

29:53 joint commission.

29:58 It is critical to us that any

29:59 legal and regulatory

30:01 requirements are harmonious

30:04 with current state and federal

30:06 law and recognize the

30:08 complexity of our institutions.

30:10 We respectfully ask that the

30:13 council move carefully and

30:14 deliberately in considering

30:17 this ordinance and convene the

30:18 various stakeholders as you

30:21 have today, um, that have

30:23 expressed operational concerns

30:25 with the ordinance as drafted

30:28 before moving it forward as you

30:31 do move it forward, however, we

30:34 stand ready to work with you to

30:35 craft an ordinance that

30:37 recognizes the unique training

30:39 support needed for hospital

30:41 security officers to be

30:44 successful in these roles in

30:46 addition to specific

30:47 recommendations that we will

30:49 provide as part of written

30:51 testimony, uh, we would also

30:54 urge that you consider two

30:57 alternative approaches.

31:00 First, allow hospitals and

31:01 other employers with robust